Brittney Cox
Reading
Reflection 9
There are many ways we can understand our students’ prior
knowledge. I would like to specifically
focus on the KWL assessment. Each
student will begin a project with the KWL graphic organizer. First they will write what they know and what
they want to know about the subject.
After, or during, the process of the project, the student would then
return to the KWL and write in what they have learned.
We
must establish anchors during a project because students
connect new ideas to their prior knowledge.
Before we begin the project, we
must know what their prior knowledge is so that we can introduce new ideas in
an appropriate and effective way. We
want all of our learners to be successful, and these anchors are the first step
in the right direction.
Multiple
choice tests are not good tools to measure what a student knows about a
subject. Instead of using traditional
summative assessment formats, like a research paper or multiple choice tests,
we should make rubrics and have students present what they have learned. This is more authentic and will allow us as
teachers to get an accurate measurement of the students’ learning. We should also break up the grading groups so
late papers do not change the content grade.
If a student writes an “A” paper, but hands it in two days late and
receives a “C,” we are hindering our own ability to assess their
knowledge. I am not saying they should
not get docked for handing it in late, but it should not be included in the
grade of the work itself.
Our
project uses rubrics rather than a traditional summative assessments. We want our students to learn through
experience and not memorize facts. We
will assess our students’ prior knowledge by using a KWL before the projects
begins, this way our anchors will be put in place. Our students will know what their learning
objectives are every day and will have the freedom to make choices and
mistakes.